The Arc of Greater Beaumont
Legal name: Association for Retarded Citizens Texas Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 201706452
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Beaumont, TX, USA
- Phone
- (409)838-9012
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $330,725
- Expenses
- $355,692
- Assets
- $1,526,986
- Liabilities
- $158,980
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TOYE BABB (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- TOYE BABB (PRESIDENT)
- LESLIE DEAN (SECRETARY)
- ERICA DUCKWORTH (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To create possibilities for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities to grow, learn, and live. _Advocacy:_ The Arc believes in self-advocacy and self-determination. People with intellectual and developmental disabilities, with appropriate resources and supports, can make decisions about their own lives and must be defined by their own strengths, abilities, and inherent value, not by their disability. _Education:_ The Arc believes that the community should be educated and be aware of the abilities of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. The Arc believes that through knowledge and understanding comes acceptance and value. The Arc of Greater Beaumont’s programs and services serve the organization’s mission while staying true to it’s values and vision for the community.
What it reported doing in 2024
Children & family services benefits: provides services to families and/or caregivers of children birth through 18 with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Services include, information and referrals for families and caregivers; support group for families of children with autism; support group for families of children with down syndrome; "family fun days" full of activities for families of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities; summer day camps for children with intellectual and developmental disabilities; stipend program for children to receive funding for summer services; annual day long educational conferences for parents and caregivers of children with intellectual and developmental
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 45
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 84.2%; rating input score 84
- Program expense ratio: 78.2%; rating input score 78
- Fundraising efficiency: $18.44 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -7.5%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.29; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.1; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -3% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.6% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 2 programs and campaigns described on the official site
- Where the money goes: 84.2% of revenue deployed · 78.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $278K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 15 people listed
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 55/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 25/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 26/100.