Association for Quality in Audio Visual Technology Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 452487297
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Great River, NY, USA
- Phone
- 5162662624
- Rating
- 38
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $145,843
- Expenses
- $117,178
- Assets
- $39,218
- Liabilities
- $1,780
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- WILLIAM J LAWRENCE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- JEREMY ELSESSER (VICE PRESIDENT/GLOBALIZATI)
- JAMES E MALTESE (VICE PRESIDENT/STANDARDS)
- KRISTI ROSS-CLAUSEN (VICE PRESIDENT/MEMBERSHIP/)
- SHANE SPRINGER (VICE PRESIDENT/EDUCATION)
- JAMES PATTERSON (VICE PRESIDENT/MARKETING)
People named in this filing
- WILLIAM J LAWRENCE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- JEREMY ELSESSER (VICE PRESIDENT/GLOBALIZATI)
- JAMES E MALTESE (VICE PRESIDENT/STANDARDS)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Form 990-ez, part iii, primary exempt purpose - dedicated to improving the operational art of designing and installing audio visual technology by focusing on the quality management systems of those who design and install for the benefit of the industry and all its stakeholders: clients and users of av technology, av designers and installers, equipment manufacturers, related constructions and architechtural firms, and the environment. It does so by:-defining standards for quality management systems for av technology providers-providing training on av quality issues-providing appraisal audits of av systems-providing appraisal audits of av companies
What it reported doing in 2024
Form 990-ez, part iii, program service accomplishments: association for quality in audio visual technology, inc. Focuses on quality management systems (the "human systems") that av companies use to assure consistent quality. We "point to" applicable standards and best practices developed by avixa, aes, smpte, and otehrs. The organization held virtual programs and seminars throughout the year that accomplished the following:1. Define standards for quality management systems (av9000)2. Provide training on av quality issues3. Provide appraisal audits of av systems4. Provide appraisal audits of av companies
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 96% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 54
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 19.7%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.33; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -25% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.6% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 28/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 31/100.