Association for Machine Translation in the Americas

Legal name: Association for Machine Translation in the Americas Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
521747514
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2023
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2023
Location
Washington, DC, USA
Phone
5704768006
Rating
33
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Professional Societies, Associations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$23,125
Expenses
$24,021
Assets
$181,692
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Alex Yanishevsky (Vice President; Welocalize)
  • Jay Marciano (President; Lengoo)

People named in this filing

  • Alex Yanishevsky (Vice President; Welocalize)
  • Jay Marciano (President; Lengoo)
  • Janice Campbell (Secretary; Adobe)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

AMTA is an association of researchers and users of machine translation technologies.

What it reported doing in 2023

The Association for Machine Translation in the Americas (AMTA) hosted the organization's virtual Webinar on 8 November 2023. It featured two tracks of approximately 8 speakers each through the day. Presentations of submitted and invited papers were organized in two program tracks, MT research, MT users. Attendees moved among the tracks with breaks organized in a synchronized manner. Virtual attendees were given the opportunity to get interact wit hte presenters via Q&A sessions. Several tutorials and workshops were held throughout the day as well. The webinar was attended by about 240 people.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 74
  • Sustainability: 59
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -3.9%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.56; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -16.3% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -1.7% per year; rating input score 0; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0.4% per year; rating input score 0; 37th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 2 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2010 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 39/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.