Association for Facilities Engineering
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 362438746
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2017
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2017
- Location
- Mclean, VA, USA
- Phone
- 5713958777
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Public, Societal Benefit
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $570,269
- Expenses
- $530,540
- Assets
- $78,661
- Liabilities
- $11,148
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROY NATION (PRESIDENT)
- STEPHEN NICHOLAS (VICE PRESIDENT OF PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT)
- FRED KING (VICE PRESIDENT OF FINANCE)
- ANTHONY FEBBRARO (VICE PRESIDENT OF MEMBERSHIP)
- JOE LAROCCO (PRESIDENT ELECT)
- DENNIS HYDRICK (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- WAYNE SAYA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $62,065 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide tools and resources to enhance the expertise and broaden the connections of facilities management professionals worldwide.
What it reported doing in 2017
Association for facilities engineering provided benefits regarding issues and concerns relating to the field of facilities engineering, facilities management, and energy-related solutions to its association members through the "facilities engineering journal," e-news, website and other mediums. The association has and continues to offer monthly facilities-specific webinars while also providing complimentary training to the u.s. Army fort bragg soldier for life program and contracted u.s. Government work for the u.s. Department of state overseas building operations and for the federal emergency management agency.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.15; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.14; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 11.7%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -8.3% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -16.5% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 5 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $62K · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 10 of 10 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2014 to 2017
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 7/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 29/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 43/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.