Associated Rehabilitation Program for Womeninc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
942358275
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Carmichael, CA, USA
Phone
9169443920
Rating
93
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Alcohol, Drug and Substance Abuse, Dependency Prevention and Treatment

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,400,861
Expenses
$2,069,798
Assets
$1,555,326
Liabilities
$234,235

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LISA BEINTKER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • MARNE LAUGHLIN (PRESIDENT)
  • MARY FRAN CYSEWSKI (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • LISA BEINTKER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $148,850 total reported compensation
  • Nancy Aragon (ASSISTANT DIRECTOR): $115,155 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Residential treatment for women with alcohol and other drug abuse challenges.

What it reported doing in 2024

Organization which serves adult women with substance abuse problems. Its programs include 2 residential recovery homes. Arpw is licensed and certified by the California department health care services to provide the following services: recovery and treatment planning; individual session; group sessions; and educational sessions and relapse prevention. The mission of arpw is to offer comprehensive alcohol and other drug problems services by providing opportunities and skills leading to healthy and productive life styles. Arpw offers a comfortable and homelike setting that encourages the women to nurture and empower themselves and each other. Arpw offers residential serices at the two (2) locations in carmichael, ca: alpha oaks (23 beds); and cornerstone (11 beds). Residential services are provided at alpha oaks, 8400 fair oaks blvd., carmichael, ca and cornerstone, 6348 & 6350 appian way, carmichael, ca.lengths of treament 30-90 days. Our residential programs provide education and treatment activities that address aod use, underlying issues, related problems, recovery and relapse prevention. A treatment plan is developed using assessment tools designed with the particiants own goals included. Our programs provide a minimum of 20 hours per week of treatment. The women are introduced to and familiarized with community recovery resources. Weekly discussions on the physiological, psychological and social effects of addiction, AIDS and hepatitis careprovided. 9,328 bed days were provided.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 99% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 88
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 49
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 82.5%; rating input score 82
  • Program expense ratio: 95.5%; rating input score 96
  • Fundraising efficiency: $1,543.29 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 13.8%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.75; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.15; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 12.8%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 17.4% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 16.1% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 12.3% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 82.5% of revenue deployed · 95.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $149K · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 27 of 28 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 28/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 23/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 50/100.