Associated General Contractors of Mississippi Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
640324725
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Jackson, MS, USA
Phone
6019811144
Rating confidence
Limited

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$888,039
Expenses
$904,373
Assets
$1,166,461
Liabilities
$179,124

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

18 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CAM ROBERDS (PAST PRESIDENT)
  • MATT CARPENTER (PRESIDENT)
  • ROY ANDERSON IV (VICE PRESIDENT-PRESIDENT ELECT)
  • LLOYD MUNN (FORMER EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • TODD BRADFORD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • LLOYD MUNN (FORMER EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $67,771 total reported compensation
  • TODD BRADFORD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $39,790 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide leadership and services to agc members and to the construction industry to create a better business climate for the industry in Mississippi, to serve as spokesperson for the industry, and to improve the public image of the construction industry.

What it reported doing in 2025

2025 was a year of transition and refocus for associated general contractors (agc) of Mississippi. The association continued to host strong networking and member engagement opportunities across the state, with particularly high attendance at the build ms awards and christmas party in december.membership activity remained steady, with new members added throughout the year, while the need to improve retention and overall engagement was recognized. Efforts were also made to expand outreach in areas such as north Mississippi and to strengthen communication with members. Significant leadership and staffing changes occurred. Lloyd munn's tenure ended mid-year, and both sonya mullins and kay wise retired. Todd bradford was hired as executive director in september, and courtney williams joined as assistant director at the end of october. The association also transitioned accounting functions to an outsourced cpa firm to improve operations. Financially, the focus was on reducing expenses, improving collections of dues and job fees, and stabilizing the association following prior year challenges.looking ahead, the board and staff placed a strong emphasis on modernization. Plans were initiated for a new website, improved social media presence, and enhanced technology platforms to better serve members and increase engagement.overall, 2025 was a foundational year that positioned agc of Mississippi for improved operations and a stronger future.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 34
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1.8%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.29; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.15; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 11.9%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 1.2% per year; rating input score 100; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2.5% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $68K · 18 people listed
  • Consistency: 13 of 13 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 25/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 29/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 32/100.