Assoc of Student Assistance Professionals of New Jersey Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 222773343
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- Allenhurst, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 7322022686
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $105,873
- Expenses
- $103,239
- Assets
- $47,517
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PAMELA FELDER (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- PAMELA FELDER (PRESIDENT)
- VIKKI SZABO (1ST VICE PRE)
- DOREEN CONSULMAGNO (2ND VICE PRE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provide support for the youth of New Jersey who exhibit issues involving mental health, drug addiction, and drug abuse.
What it reported doing in 2023
The organization was founded as an association in 1983 and formally incorporated in 1986 to meet the needs of New Jersey youth in education, prevention, and referral services in areas of high risk and addictive behaviors. These risk behaviors include the use of alcohol, tobacco, and various other addictive drugs. There are over 500 members who are student assistance professionals, student assistance coordinators, prevention specialists, educators, and health care professionals. The organization trains them to recognize youth who exhibit mental health and/or substance abuse issues.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 99
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 97.5%; rating input score 98
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.5%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.46; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 11% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -2.6% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -3.1% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 97.5% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $103K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2012 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.