Assoc of Fundraising Professionals Indiana Chapter

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
310965509
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Westfield, IN, USA
Phone
3178240940
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$74,132
Expenses
$75,334
Assets
$366,610

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

21 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DANIELLE STILES-POLK (PRESIDENT)
  • TRAVIS TESTER CFRE (PRESIDENT EL)

People named in this filing

  • DANIELLE STILES-POLK (PRESIDENT)
  • TRAVIS TESTER CFRE (PRESIDENT EL)
  • AMANDA MASSEY (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The association is organized as a professional association to serve charitable organizations in Indiana by encouraging educational and professional growth as well as public support of fund development.

What it reported doing in 2025

Association of fundraising professionals Indiana chapter (afpic) has been organized as a non-profit corporation for education, scientific and charitable purposes to provide opportunities for the exchange of information and advancement of knowledge of philanthropy professionals within their membership's geographical area. Afpic supports and serves the fundraising professional to promote philanthropy in Indiana by offering service and support, ethics and high standards, leadershuip development, professionalism, professional growth, advocacy for the profession and philanthropy, diversity and collegiality.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 93% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 71
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 49
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 74.2%; rating input score 74
  • Program expense ratio: 67.3%; rating input score 67

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1.6%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.87; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -1.3% per year; rating input score 0; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -4.2% per year; rating input score 0; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.7% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 74.2% of revenue deployed · 67.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $51K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 21 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2016 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 39/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.