Assoc for Hospital Med Edu
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 366098082
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Irwin, PA, USA
- Phone
- 7248647321
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,598,382
- Expenses
- $1,481,365
- Assets
- $3,822,344
- Liabilities
- $553,581
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JULIE MCCAUSLAND MD MS FACEP (PRESIDENT)
- ALYSON RIDDICK MHA C-TAGME (PRESIDENT -)
Highest reported compensation
- TIA DRAKE (EXECUTIVE DI): $186,300 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The association for hospital medical education (ahme) is a national organization of institutions and individuals concerned with medical education. This concern covers all phases of medical education, including undergraduate, graduate and continuing medical education, either singly or in a variety of combinations. The majority of these teaching hospitals has a functional association with one or more colleges of medicine and represents a large segment of the clinical facilities available for graduate training in the united states. These hospitals have made extensive commitments to graduate and continuing medical education for many years. The association qualifies as a not-for-profit organization under internal revenue code 501(c)(6) and is exempt from income taxes.
What it reported doing in 2024
Publications (ahme news, guide to medical education in the teaching hospital, remediation of the struggling medical learner book, the journal for continuing education in the health professions, remediation case studies: helping struggling medical learners and clinical reasoning: coaching the struggling medical learner)are produced to provide informational and educational articles to members.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 60
- Transparency & Controls: 66
- Accountability: 94
- Sustainability: 55
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 66.4%; rating input score 66
- Program expense ratio: 69.2%; rating input score 69
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 86
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.3%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.58; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.14; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 12.6%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 11.7% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.7% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 66.4% of revenue deployed · 69.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 6 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $186K · 18 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $387K reported
- Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 56/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 29/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 37/100.