Assistance League of Greater Portland

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
936032769
IRS 990 coverage
2019–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Beaverton, OR, USA
Phone
5035269300
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,056,753
Expenses
$1,002,552
Assets
$5,966,651
Liabilities
$592,384

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KATRINKA EASTERDAY (PRESIDENT)
  • MARY FELDMAN (PRESIDENT-ELECT)

People named in this filing

  • KATRINKA EASTERDAY (PRESIDENT)
  • MARY FELDMAN (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
  • JANE SCOTT (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Volunteers transforming the lives of children and adults through community programs.

What it reported doing in 2024

Operation school bell : operation school bell, the chapter's flagship program, provides new, appropriate school clothing for children in need, grades pre-k through 12. All recipients fall below the national poverty level and/or are homeless. Two main processes were used to provide this service. In the portland public school district, new clothing purchased by the assistance league of greater portland is provided for distribution to the portland pta clothing center, serving portland public schools; wichita center for family and community serving north clackamas school district; and snowcap community charities, serving parkrose, centennial, david douglas, gresham/barlow and reynolds school districts. Continued on schedule o.in the beaverton and hillsboro school districts, the schools' counselors refer families who have the greatest need among the many children at risk. Each student receives a redeemable voucher at designated local fred meyer stores. This was the third year using the vouchers instead of the chapter hosting in-store shopping events. This modification was developed by the operation school bell program team in conjunction with the beaverton and hillsboro school districts to better serve the children and families in need. In the 2024-2025 school year, 3,205 vouchers were distributed, and 3,093 vouchers (96.5%) were redeemed.the assistance league of greater portland provides seasonally appropriate new clothing in various sizes to the students that use the portland pta clothing center, serving portland public schools; wichita center for family and community serving north clackamas school district; and snowcap community charities, serving parkrose, centennial, david douglas, gresham/barlow, and reynolds school districts. The chapter served an estimated 1,355 children with $65,000 worth of clothing purchased whole-sale in the 2024-2025 school year. The operation school bell program began in 1998 and has increased the number of children served substantially since inception. This program is unique in that the chapter provides new clothing. Research shows that new clothes build children's self-esteem so that they can attend school dressed appropriately to their peer level and ready to learn. Feedback from school counselors and parents show increased student confidence and readiness for school instead of avoidance.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 83% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 98% of its reported program spending out as grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 64
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 94
  • Sustainability: 64
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 68.9%; rating input score 69
  • Program expense ratio: 69.5%; rating input score 70
  • Fundraising efficiency: $4.82 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 86
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5.1%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.95; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.1; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 16.1% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10.3% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.4% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 68.9% of revenue deployed · 69.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 6 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $697K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 17/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 50/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 43/100.