Assistance Dogs International Inc C/o Chris Diefenthaler

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
930993471
IRS 990 coverage
2017–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2016
Location
Maumee, OH, USA
Phone
4193505788
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Professional Societies, Associations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$811,012
Expenses
$736,145
Assets
$734,433
Liabilities
$130,433

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • CHRIS DIEFENTHALER (EXECUTIVE DI): $97,200 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Adi fosters a collaborative global community dedicated to the highest standards of excellence for the assistance dog industry.

What it reported doing in 2024

Adi is a coalition of worldwide non profit organizations that train and place assistance dogs. As of december 2024, adi's membership consisted of 160 accredited member organizations and 52 candidate programs across 29 countries. In 2024, 10 members successfully completed their very thorough accreditation process. 25 new candidate programs have been approved to work towards their accreditation process. 2024 proved to be a year full of exciting changes to make adi stronger and better for our members. Adi is concluding our first strategic plan that was introduced in 2022. Our plan kept us focused on four pillars of priorities: enhancing standards of excellence; grow, engage, and develop adi global membership; enhance awareness of adi, its members and the value of assistance dogs; and enhance organizational efficiency and effectiveness. Adi has accomplished 75% of the action items identified in the plan. Some action items have become regular procedures while others will be carried over to the next strategic plan. Our new 2025-2027 strategic plan is currently under development. Education programming continues to be a priority for adi. The board made the decision to change the cadence of our conferences to every other year, allowing us to offer small regional workshops in the conference off years. Our first trainers' workshop in belgium was a hugh success with over 75 trainers and 25 dogs attending the workshop. Adi continues to promote the digital id card globally to provide clients with a tool that verifies their status as an adi certified assistance dog team. As the assistance dog field continues to expand and grow across the globe, adi and our members are being asked to do more. Adi's mission to our members is to offer help, faciliate support, as well as offer programs and educational opportunities so our members can focus on their mission to help their clients to live their fullest lives with assistance dogs.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 90
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 79
  • Sustainability: 48
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 89.2%; rating input score 89
  • Program expense ratio: 97.9%; rating input score 98
  • Fundraising efficiency: $40.72 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 9.2%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.18; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 13.2%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 15% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 19.9% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 17.6% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 89.2% of revenue deployed · 97.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $721K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $97K · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2017 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 27/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 33/100.