Aspiremn
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 363445759
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2016
- Location
- St Paul, MN, USA
- Phone
- 6519273694
- Rating
- 48
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $492,923
- Expenses
- $505,544
- Assets
- $300,185
- Liabilities
- $48,045
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Kirsten Anderson (Executive Director)
Highest reported compensation
- Kirsten Anderson (Executive Director): $128,660 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Promote education, professional development & peer consultation within the profession of therapeutic providers.
What it reported doing in 2025
During 2025 we worked on the following goals as part of our ongoing strategic plan: Voice: To inform and influence the policies and systems that impact our members. - The 2025 Legislature passed language increasing the Medicaid outpatient mental health rate to 100% of Medicare rates - the victory is curtailed by HR1, impacts uncertain - Additional 2025 legislative successes include expansion of kinship foster care licensing flexibilities, decompression funding for the mental health collaboration hub, PRTF Working Group, expanded access to certified family peer specialist training, and more - Members worked together to establish a youth justice point of view and are emphasizing the need to build a responsive continuum - Media strategies included generation of legislative and congressionally focused content with: o Earned media o Expert contributions to story development o Editorial board meetings - Intentional partnership with state government: eg: participation in NASHP Infrastructure: To design an infrastructure to support a growing association and respond to an evolving marketplace. - Creating new pathway for Mission Partners by updating bylaws to invite new levels of participation - The AspireMN Leadership Certificate training was launched, tapping internal trainers and experts to build leadership skills in a very diverse first cohort with over graduates - Updating CORE operations by deepening engagement with CASCW - Launch of Family Social Service Child Welfare Pilot (possibility-imbued) Membership: To leverage the power of our voice and network through an inspired membership. - Welcomed new members - Catholic Charities of Saint Cloud, MN Care Services and Relate Counseling - Residential site visits were hosted across the state, including a wide diversity in service models and licensures - - Day Treatment site visits were launched - Established a Trauma Informed Care Consultation Series to support responses to highly aggressive children and build association-wide capabilities to improve care - Shifted our unemployment insurance trust relationship to First Nonprofit to deliver stronger services to members and an increased sponsorship revenue - Supporting Peer Reviews to create stronger connections between member organizations. Equity & Inclusion//Antiracism: To dismantle systems and that result in disparate outcomes, experiences of exclusion, and harm while we build a wider field that is culturally responsive and supportive of the uniqueness of every person. - Advanced public policies that address disparities and disproportionate impacts, and builds the future workforce and service that respond to community preferences including support for culturally specific services, including leadership on: o Expanding access to kinship caregivers o Supporting growth of the mental health field with peers and increasingly diverse roles o Building our continuum of services to be increasingly individualized and responsive to children and families - Focus on generational leadership at September leadership retreat, and continued commitment to leadership development to meet the moment and build skills for an increasingly diverse workforce - Innovation Summit workshops emphasized antiracism learning, including examining the intersectionality of antiracism and neurodiversity
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 26
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2.6%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.59; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.16; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 25.4%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 11.4% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.2% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $191K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $129K · 16 people listed
- Consistency: 10 of 11 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2019 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 30/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 28/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.