Aspire Indiana Health
Legal name: Aspire Indiana Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 351341204
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Noblesville, IN, USA
- Phone
- (877) 574-1254
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Community Mental Health Center
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $48,920,765
- Expenses
- $63,447,621
- Assets
- $64,449,894
- Liabilities
- $32,671,247
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
34 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANTONY SHEEHAN (President & Chief Executive Officer)
- Christopher Lloyd (Vice President - Marketing & Communications)
- Darrell Mitchell (Vice President - Recovery Capital)
- Demetruis Dillard (Vice President - Information Systems & Technology)
- JAMES SKEEL (Executive Vice President/Chief Transformation Officer)
- Kelly Howe (Vice President - Home & Community Based Services)
Highest reported compensation
- ANTONY SHEEHAN (President & Chief Executive Officer): $491,789 total reported compensation
- JERRY SHEWARD (ASSOCIATE MEDICAL DIRECTOR-PSYCHIATRY): $439,363 total reported compensation
- Jonathan Butler (Chief Medical Officer (End 12/31/24)): $435,768 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The People Effect: Together, making health and well being a reality!
What it reported doing in 2024
Mockingbird hill recovery center opened in anderson, in march 2021, bringing a major new treatment facility to madison county for those with substance use disorder (sud). It represents a new way of thinking about treating addiction: instead of scattering the pieces to the recovery puzzle and expecting people to find them, we bring everything needed for long-term recovery right to them while providing a stable, safe place to live. Onsite services will include primary medical care, behavioral health therapy, peer support groups, medication-assisted treatment (mat), individual case management, education and job training, and more.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 24
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 87.5%; rating input score 88
- Program expense ratio: 67.3%; rating input score 67
- Fundraising efficiency: $12.27 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 6 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -29.7%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.02; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.51; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.9%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 87.5% of revenue deployed · 67.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $42.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $492K · 34 people listed · 6 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $4M reported
- Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 7 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 44/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 28/100.