Aspire a Mindful Place

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
922834057
IRS 990 coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Borger, TX, USA
Phone
8066819961
Rating
62
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Mental Health Treatment F31 Psychiatric, Mental Health Hospital

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,010,834
Expenses
$233,972
Assets
$1,563,329
Liabilities
$2,611

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JULIE WINTERS (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • JULIE WINTERS (PRESIDENT): $76,499 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Specifically, the purpose is to provide access to mental health care services for residents of the Texas panhandle regardless of socioeconomic status. The focus will be on the prevention, early intervention, and educational aspects of mental health in hopes of providing patients from children through the elderly with tools to not only get through mental health crisis situations, but also help prevent mental health occurrences by addressing educational needs across the mental health spectrum for families and communities in the rural areas of the Texas panhandle.

What it reported doing in 2025

- to consider the task forces point of view and information from panhandle behavioral health alliance (pbha) for mental health care challenges for borger, hutchinson and surrounding counties. - to communicate a simplified analysis relating to rural patient's demographics and logistic issues. - to propose a recommendation for mental health care in hutchinson county. - to give those interested a high level and first pass look of what rural care may look like and estimated cost to achieve that goal. - to begin, promote a positive and collaborative culture for this process for all involved. - create a concept plan to be appropriatley revised through the phases of the project for an agreed to successful outcome.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 26
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 74
  • Sustainability: 80
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 11%; rating input score 11
  • Program expense ratio: 44%; rating input score 44
  • Fundraising efficiency: $16.52 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 76.9%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.68; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 32.7%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 169.9% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 16.3% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 66.3% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 11% of revenue deployed · 44% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $103K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $76K · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 11/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 44/100.
  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 50/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.