Asociacion Acirc Corp
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 660804198
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- San Juan, PR, USA
- Phone
- 7879401662
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Arts, Cultural Organizations - Multipurpose
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $499,521
- Expenses
- $611,678
- Assets
- $639,424
- Liabilities
- $87,867
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- EDUARDO M RIVAS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- LUIS D ROSA (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- EDUARDO M RIVAS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $72,148 total reported compensation
- MAITE RIVERA (ACTIVITIES COODINATOR): $68,844 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To promote and recognize the artistic work of circus and street performance through diverse initiatives, artistic and cultural activities, like; festivals, workshops, educational exchange, show, performances, etc.
What it reported doing in 2024
EL BASTION-Multidisciplinary cultural center recovered and self-managed by a collective of artists, with the intention of promoting the development of the arts in general. The space allows the development of endless cultural endeavors. We provide courses in dance, circus, theater, music, plastic arts, audiovisual techniques, photography, scenic construction and permaculture among other things, as well as presentations of shows, talks, conferences, intensive workshops with artists local and international.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 14
- Sustainability: 23
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 95.6%; rating input score 96
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -22.5%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.05; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.14; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 23.1%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 29.5% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.1% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 40.3% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 95.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 6 board members independent · 3 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $585K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $72K · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 43 of 44 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 13/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 16/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 23/100.