Asm International-philadelphia Liberty Bell Chapter

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
912069662
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Materials Park, OH, USA
Phone
4406713800
Rating
90
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Professional Societies, Associations

Reported finances

Revenue
$13,917
Expenses
$25,965
Assets
$136,060

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

People named in this filing

  • DAVE KIESSLING (DIRECTOR OF)
  • PAUL SZCZEPANIAK (CHAIR)
  • DREW BATTEN (VICE CHAIR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our chapter exists for the exclusive purpose of advancing in our geographical region, scientific, engineering, technical and practical knowledge, particularly with respect to the manufacture, treatment, selection and use of engineering materials. This is done through education, research, and the compliation and dissemination of information useful to indvidual members and prospective mebmers of the society and is beneficial to the general public.

What it reported doing in 2024

To provide attendees with an opportunity to learn about advancements and technologies in materials science via monthly technical meeting; provide educational oppurtunities and achievement recognition through continuing education courses in materials science and nominations for national awards in office; disseminate information related to materials science and engineering through the internet, newsletters and other publications; provide assistance to students interested in materials science and engineering, in the form of contests, career guidance and scholarships.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 74% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 61% for direct work, and 39% for grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 36
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -86.6%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.24; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.5% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.4% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $26K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.