ASIS INTERNATIONAL INC Phoenix Chapter

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
866087631
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Phoenix, AZ, USA
Rating
93
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$44,089
Expenses
$38,386
Assets
$29,715

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Stephanie Switz (Chapter Chair)
  • David Ellis (Vice Chair)
  • Jay Leonard (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

ASIS International and its local chapters globally are dedicated to expanding and enriching knowledge sharing best practices and peer-to-peer connections so security professionals across disciplines and at all stages of their career can get access to the information and resources they need to succeed personally and professionally. In addition one of the chapters primary initiatives is giving back to the community in which its members live. This involves hosting or joining local community initiatives such as charity events

What it reported doing in 2024

Another primary initiative of the ASIS Phoenix Chapter is to support local law enforcement. Each year the chapter hosts a luncheon and invites all law enforcement within the state of Arizona. During the event we honor selected officers who went above and beyond in their duties and we also honor the ones who were killed in the line of duty. All proceeds outside of the cost are donated directly to the families of the fallen officers split evenly. A silent auction is also held in which all of those proceeds are donated to the 100 Club a local non-profit whose mission it is to support officers injured or killed in the line of duty. In 2024 $3,000 was paid to families of two fallen officers and $4800 dollars was paid to the 100 Club

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 49
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 12.9%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.77; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -1.8% per year; rating input score 0; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.7% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $60K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 40/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.