Asians to the World Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
593760654
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2020
Forms available
Form 990 2015, Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
Orlando, FL, USA
Phone
8184288075
Rating
58
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Christianity
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$133,098
Expenses
$106,160
Assets
$30,344
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MAJOR R CAUSING (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • MAJOR R CAUSING (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • GEORGE NORRIS (DIRECTOR)
  • JENNELYN BAUTISTA (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To work together with the international community by mobilizing asian filipinos utilizing media, internet, schools, charitable & social services in order to reach & develop them into a faith-based community and to empower them to become self-sustaining & have a better quality of life.

What it reported doing in 2020

Despite the pandemic, the nonprofit suffered financial difficulty but yet was able to pay rent and conduct regular activities by providing food and services to the community.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 29
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 48
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 26.3%; rating input score 26
  • Program expense ratio: 33%; rating input score 33

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 20.2%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.29; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 10.8%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -18.8% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -9.3% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 13.9% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 26.3% of revenue deployed · 33% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $35K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2014 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 26/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 33/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 18/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 27/100.