Asian & Pacific Islander American Health Forum

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
943030866
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2018
Location
San Francisco, CA, USA
Phone
4155683320
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
AIDS

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$3,071,152
Expenses
$5,344,215
Assets
$14,343,063
Liabilities
$1,664,326

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

20 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JULIET K CHOI (PRESIDENT & CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • JULIET K CHOI (PRESIDENT & CEO): $323,764 total reported compensation
  • LILY SHEN (CHIEF OF STAFF): $187,557 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Apiahf is a national health justice organization which influences policy, mobilizes communities, & strengthens programs & organizations to improve the health of asian americans, native hawaiians, & pacific islanders living in the us & its territories.

What it reported doing in 2025

The asian & pacific islander american health forum (the "health forum") is a California nonprofit public benefit corporation, which was established by health professionals and other concerned groups to promote policy, program and research efforts for improving the health of asian and pacific islanders in the united states and u.s. Affiliated jurisdictions in the pacific. The health forum's programs and projects are categorized as follows: affordable care act program - the health forum provides technical assistance and supports a learning community for community-based organizations that are engaged in outreach, education, and enrollment assistance for expanded health insurance options provided by the affordable care act. The program provides grants, tools, skills, and trainings and disseminates best practices and information for community based organizations to optimize outreach, education and enrollment activities for asian american (aa), native hawaiian and pacific islander (nhpi), limited english proficient (lep) and immigrant consumers. The program also collaborates with national health policy organizations to advocate for improvements to health insurance marketplaces to increase accessibility for aa and nhpi, lep and immigrant consumers. Health policy development - the health forum advocates for health equity in health services and all policies; for greater access to care and insurance coverage for all vulnerable populations; for accurate representation of the health needs of distinct and diverse asian american, native hawaiian and pacific islander communities in health policy; for robust data to reveal disparities; and for responsive external relationships across multiple sectors, including government, business, academia, and advocacy. Community initiatives - the health forum provides opportunities for community members, service providers, researchers and advocates to network and share their expertise and recommendations with each other and with policy makers to promote the health and well-being of asian americans, native hawaiians, and pacific islanders. The health forum disseminates promising practices, analyses, and information including data and research through conferences, conventions, and electronic media including the health forum's website, social media, and publications. This allows network partners to utilize these resources for their own local and state-based work, while contributing to a body of knowledge and action that is organized by the health forum at the national level. These programs also award grants and provide other resources to community members, service providers, and researchers to promote the health and well-being of asian americans, native hawaiians, and pacific islanders. Capacity building programs - the health forum provides technical assistance, training and tools to community-based organizations to enhance their capacity to serve and advocate for their communities. It is designed to enhance the ability of community-based organizations to plan, deliver, monitor and evaluate effective, evidence-based prevention interventions and strategies. The program also works with community leaders to develop the internal infrastructure (e.g., finance, human resources, governance) to support these interventions and to build lasting organizations. Capacity building services are also available to public health departments and other clients, upon demand. Special projects - through the spirit of innovation, the health forum develops new business through partnerships with the private sector and other stakeholders. This includes projects in contract with partners, as well as hosting convenings and conferences to bring together community-based partners, government officials, congressional leaders, business leaders, academics and researchers, and other health advocates to highlight the health needs and disparities among the asian american, native hawaiian, and pacific islander communities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 65% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 97% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 79
  • Transparency & Controls: 72
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 30
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 66.5%; rating input score 66
  • Fundraising efficiency: $4 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 53.9%; rating input score 54; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -74%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.68; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.12; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 9.6%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 0.4% per year; rating input score 100; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.2% per year; rating input score 100; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 17% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 66.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $324K · 20 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $1.7M reported
  • Consistency: 36 of 37 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2012 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 6 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 11/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 54/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 34/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 46/100.