Asian Pacific Institute on Gender-based Violence
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 462288278
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- San Francisco, CA, USA
- Phone
- 4155683315
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Humanities Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $9,833,274
- Expenses
- $8,986,766
- Assets
- $5,893,068
- Liabilities
- $1,210,586
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MONICA KHANT (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- MONICA KHANT (CEO): $173,790 total reported compensation
- JENNY LEE (DIR OF FINANCE): $159,501 total reported compensation
- SARAH KHAN (DIR OF PROGRAMS): $147,228 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to disrupt gender-based violence, which causes physical, sexual, emotional, spiritual, and economic harm within AAPI communities throughout the U.S. and its territories.
What it reported doing in 2024
The Interpretation Technical Assistance & Resource Center (ITARC) works to improve systems responses to LEP victims by providing technical assistance and training on the development and implementation of language access policies and procedures. Technical assistance and training includes, but is not limited to: language and interpreter skill assessment; interpretation and translation procedures; interpreting for victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, stalking, dating violence, and trafficking ; and building pools of qualified trauma informed interpreters through workshops on interpretation ethics and skills building.During the fiscal year, ITARC provided 2,894 hours of training on language assistance planning to participants representing a wide range of professions and systems, including victim service organizations, state coalitions, courts, legal services, law enforcement, interpreters and translators, technical assistance providers, child welfare, higher education, healthcare, and other community partners. ITARC also provided 106 technical assistance support to a wide range of partners, including domestic violence and sexual assault programs, state and territorial coalitions, culturally specific organizations, legal services, courts, Family Justice Centers, child welfare agencies, disability organizations, and other national and community partners in over 20 states.ITARC continued to expand its Healing Across Languages (HAL) Interpreting Skills-Building Training, an intensive 20 to 40-hour program designed to address the shortage of qualified, trauma-informed interpreters serving victims and survivors of gender-based violence.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 86% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 61% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 68
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 44
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 83.9%; rating input score 84
- Program expense ratio: 91.6%; rating input score 92
- Fundraising efficiency: $33.62 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8.6%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.66; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.21; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.8%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 25.6% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 26.2% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 30.8% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 83.9% of revenue deployed · 91.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $8.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $174K · 17 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 27 of 28 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 58 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 51 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 30/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 43/100.