ACC Senior Services

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
942271380
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2025
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Sacramento, CA, US
Phone
916-394-6399
Rating
87
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Nursing, Convalescent Facilities

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$18,460,262
Expenses
$16,843,876
Assets
$51,567,870
Liabilities
$44,326,489

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

15 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CONNIE L RUSYNYK (PRESIDENT/CEO)

People named in this filing

  • JEAN SHIOMOTO (CHAIR)
  • JOYCE ISERI (VICE CHAIR)
  • BETTY MASUOKA (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our mission is to promote the general welfare and enhance the quality of life for our community by identifying, developing, and providing culturally sensitive health and social services for older adults.

What it reported doing in 2025

Community programs - enhancing the quality of life of elders and their caregivers is central to acc's community services. Renovated and opened in 2015, a 15,000 square foot community center located a mile from the care center is the site of acc's lifelong learning and wellness program (llwp), which supports and sustains the efforts of family caregivers, many of whom care for persons with alzheimer's disease and other dementias, physical disability, are no longer able to live independently, and are at risk of institutionalization. Even though acc operates an excellent nursing home, placement there is generally a last choice for care. Numerous studies find that stress and burnout can endanger family care arrangements compromising caregiver health, and exacerbating chronic illness. The llwp supports the commitment of families to sustain care giving by fostering wellness, providing information, and offering opportunities that are empowering. Acc's bridge to healthy families (initiated in 2008) and acc rides transportation services (initiated in 2003) are examples of the type of supportive services that acc provides to assure that a true continuum of long term services and support are available to older adults in the community we serve. Llwp services are provided at rates that are affordable for elders and instructor fees are fully covered by acc. In 2016, the senior community service and employment program, or "scsep", an older americans act program for sacramento county, was taken on through a contract with the national asian pacific center on aging. Through this, elders with low incomes who want to learn new job skills can receive job training and obtain work experience. The program has helped an average of 13-15 low-income job seekers annually find employment since 2017. Several awards recognizing program innovation, excellence, and multi-cultural programming have been received by acc from the administration for community living, american society on aging, aarp, pfizer, metlife, agency on aging area 4, and the national association of area agencies on aging. Llwp and rides program participants are close to 80% minority compared to the sacramento county minority population percentage of 37%. The acc rides program serves 30% white, 14% african american, 2% american indian, 42% asian, 11% hispanic, and 1% other races. Itnamerica recognized acc rides as a "trusted transportation partner" in California.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 83% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 72
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 58
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 72.5%; rating input score 72
  • Program expense ratio: 81.5%; rating input score 82
  • Fundraising efficiency: $12.88 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 8.8%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.06; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.86; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.2% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.9% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.4% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 8 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 72.5% of revenue deployed · 81.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 7 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $13.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 15 people listed
  • Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and related organizations
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2012 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 41/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 10/100.