Asian American Unity Coalition Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 843383607
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2021, Form 990-N 2019
- Location
- Edina, MN, USA
- Phone
- 9524579040
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Cultural, Ethnic Awareness
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $114,560
- Expenses
- $87,360
- Assets
- $78,907
- Liabilities
- $1,022
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Angela Anand (President)
- Yen Marshall (Vice President (External))
- Jack Hanna (Vice President (Internal))
Highest reported compensation
- Rashmi Kumari (officer): $1,890 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
AAUC envisions a nation where AANHPI achieves economic and social success, is treated fairly with equal political representation, and is free to pursue their dreams regardless of race, ethnicity, or nationality. AAUC's mission is to communicate, advocate, and collaborate with AANHPI member organizations and individuals to identify our common goals and amplify our voices to address social, political, and economic barriers.
What it reported doing in 2024
In 2020, The forum was moved online as a 9 day virtual forum with 30+ learning sessions. It attracted over 750 registered participants. Regular newsletters and webinars were provided to the public.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 58
- Transparency & Controls: 84
- Accountability: 69
- Sustainability: 57
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 58.8%; rating input score 59
- Program expense ratio: 77.1%; rating input score 77
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 23.7%; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.9; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.2%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -4.4% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 26.4% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 58.8% of revenue deployed · 77.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 2 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $67K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $2K · 16 people listed
- Consistency: 16 of 17 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 59/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 38/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 35/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 43/100.