Asian American Senior Citizens Association Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
582339416
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
Location
Norcross, GA, USA
Phone
6782674421
Rating
36
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$57,442
Expenses
$47,880
Assets
$125,850

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RUEY-LIN LEE (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • BIN CHUNG (CHAIRMAN)
  • RUEY-LIN LEE (PRESIDENT)
  • L J LEE (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Provide accessible facilities, resources, and services to enrich quality of life of asian american senior citizens.

What it reported doing in 2025

In a safe, convenient and welcoming environment, aasca offers a reich mix of activities sutiable for senior citizens convering health and wellness programs, cultural events, language and citizenship classes, and social activities. From the total shut down due to covid pandemic in 2022, aasca's membership grows back to over 250 strong in the year of 2025, thriving with 10+ activity classes, two regularly scheduled gathering per month and two annual banquet/anniversary festival and participation in multiple neighbour community functions aasca's diverse programming-including korean drum, mahjong, caligraphy and painting, taichi taich sword, karaoke, ping pong and bridge-has enabled a virant senior person community. While engaging in activie interaction, members are served hot meal, bannana croissant and beverage such a coffee and tea, free of charge every second wednesday and last sunday every month. For cy 2025 roughly 2400 box of lunches were served. The average number of attendance pe event is around 200 persons.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 61% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 1
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 60
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0.7%; rating input score 1
  • Program expense ratio: 0.9%; rating input score 1

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 16.6%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.63; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0.7% of revenue deployed · 0.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $430 in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 1/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 1/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.