Asian American Federation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 133572287
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 2123445878
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Management & Technical Assistance
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $18,726,643
- Expenses
- $19,557,840
- Assets
- $17,138,544
- Liabilities
- $6,816,887
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CATHERINE CHEN (CEO (BEGAN 5/25))
- JO-ANN YOO (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (THRU 12/24))
Highest reported compensation
- JO-ANN YOO (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (THRU 12/24)): $310,149 total reported compensation
- JOO HAN (DEPUTY DIRECTOR): $207,011 total reported compensation
- SUE LEE (DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT): $181,227 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Established in 1989, the asian american federation (aaf) is the strongest leadership organization in New York serving 1.5 million asian new yorkers. Our mission is to raise the influence and well-being of the pan-asian american community through research, policy advocacy, public awareness, and nonprofit support. Aaf does this work in partnership with approximately 70 organizations that are deeply rooted in our communities and provide social services to those in need.
What it reported doing in 2024
1) we strengthened asian american nonprofits serving New York: a) we successfully co-led the asian american pacific islander equity budget coalition to secure $30 million from New York state to fund over 136 organizations across the state. B) we supported 62 organizations with $14.6m in funding to power their work for New York's most vulnerable asian americans. C) through aaf's nonprofit resiliency series, trained 72 executive directors and other senior leaders in leadership and strategy; financial leadership and sustainability; power and influence; and trust and retention.(continuted on schedule o)2) we protected our community's safety and wellbeing: a) our hope against hate campaign has trained over 4,800 community members across 300+ workshops in situational awareness, conflict de-escalation, upstander intervention, and self-defense skills, in close partnership with our member and partner organizations. In 2025 aaf and our partners trained 600 community companions to accompany vulnerable community members. B) launched a mental health hub to serve as a one-stop shop for nonprofits and community members to access mental health information and resources in 5 asian languages (e.g. Arabic, bangla, chinese, hindi, and korean). Expanded our asian mental health directory to over 500 New York mental health providers, who, combined, speak 19 asian languages3) we invested in stronger local neighborhoods: a) provided 120 asian small businesses with direct technical assistance and trainings to support their operations
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 90% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 83% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 83
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 27
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 93.2%; rating input score 93
- Program expense ratio: 89.1%; rating input score 89
- Fundraising efficiency: $30.76 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.9%; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -4.4%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.88; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.4; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.8%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 29.5% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 26.5% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 27.9% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 93.2% of revenue deployed · 89.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $17.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $310K · 17 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $466K reported
- Consistency: 39 of 39 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 69 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 63 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 37/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 44/100.