Ashley Rose Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
113308775
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2013
Location
Massapequa, NY, USA
Phone
5166755051
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Epilepsy

Reported finances

Revenue
$-26,184
Expenses
$72,629
Assets
$365,784

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LINDA PITEK (President)

People named in this filing

  • LINDA PITEK (President)
  • RAY PITEK (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The foundation is currently focused on one program, whereby the foundation established the ashley rose pitek nurse scholars fellowship at villanova university's college of nursing. This program sponsors nurse practicioners for enrollment in the university's doctor of nursing practice programs for the completion of a doctoral degree focused on a critical aspect of spina bifida care that could be applied in practice and which would contribute to the improved care and quality of life of these children and their families.

What it reported doing in 2025

Since the ashley rose pitek nurse scholars fellowship was established in 2014 at villanova university's college of nursing, seven recipients of the award have completed the fellowship program and graduated through december 2024. The eighth candidate in the fellowship program is expected to gradute in december 2027.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 38
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 33
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -377.4%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.04; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 64.3% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -7.4% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $73K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.