Ashland Community Health Services Dba Ashland Community Hospital

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
931213059
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2016
Forms available
Form 990 2016
Location
Medford, OR, USA
Phone
5417894549
Rating
68
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Hospital, General

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$62,422,074
Expenses
$52,326,698
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

20 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ROY G VINYARD (ASANTE CEO)
  • SHEILA CLOUGH (ASHLAND CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • ROY G VINYARD (ASANTE CEO): $1,311,579 total reported compensation
  • PATRICK HOCKING (ASANTE CFO): $900,591 total reported compensation
  • SHEILA CLOUGH (ASHLAND CEO): $462,425 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Asante ashland community hospital exists to provide quality healthcare services in a compassionate manner, valued by the communities it serves.

What it reported doing in 2016

Ashland community healthcare services greatest program service accomplishment is the operation of asante ashland community hospital(aach), a 49 licensed bed not-for-profit hospital located in ashland, Oregon. During the period of october 1 2016 to september 30, 2017, aach admitted 1,688 inpatients for a total of 5,338 patient days. It also had 533 inpatient surgeries and delivered 271 babies. The outpatient departments also performed 1,944 outpatient surgeries and 8,463 home health visits. Additionally, there were 10,000 emergency room visits, 18,019 radiology studies and 5,028 wound clinic treatments.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 89% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 67
  • Transparency & Controls: 71
  • Accountability: 78
  • Sustainability: 44
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 70.4%; rating input score 70
  • Program expense ratio: 84%; rating input score 84
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 76.7%; rating input score 77; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 84.6%; rating input score 85; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 16.2%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3.9%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -0.6% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -12.9% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 70.4% of revenue deployed · 84% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 13 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $43.9M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $1.3M · 20 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $446K reported
  • Consistency: 27 of 28 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2009 to 2016
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 23/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.