Asheville Art Museum Association Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 566060776
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Asheville, NC, USA
- Phone
- 8282533227
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Art Museums
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,177,906
- Expenses
- $3,049,308
- Assets
- $30,341,075
- Liabilities
- $261,799
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Pamela Myers (Executive Director)
Highest reported compensation
- Pamela Myers (Executive Director): $192,691 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Asheville Art Museum Association, Inc. (the Museum) mission is to engage, enlighten and inspire individuals and enrich the community through dynamic experiences in American Art of the 20th and 21st centuries.
What it reported doing in 2024
In FY24/25, the Museum served 59,667 participants including 9,738 children and 236 artists through educational programs and presented 20 onsite and 7 digital exhibitions drawing from its own Collection and borrowed works. The Museum curates exhibitions and programs focusing on themes of contemporary interest and invites internationally acclaimed artists, scholars, and educators to contribute their skills. The Museum provides vital and otherwise unavailable cultural and educational services to adults and children of all ages including school and adult tours, teacher training, classes and workshops for adults and children, films, book club, artist talks, as well as volunteer and entertainment experiences. Arts-based educational programming is an important focus, and every year the Museum provides visual arts programming to audiences of all ages through a diverse range of Museum programming and activities, including outreach educational programs, group tours for K-12 groups, adults, and families, family days, after-school programs, and more. Returning arts programming to the schools, coupled with integrating the arts into the exploration of academic disciplines such as math, social studies, and visual literacy has been shown to improve critical thinking, performance, lifelong learning, and success. Strong and long-standing Museum partners include institutions throughout the region serving pre-kindergarten students through older adults. Museum programs offer access to the visual arts to at-risk, low-income youth from across WNC.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 60% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 65
- Accountability: 97
- Sustainability: 81
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 80%; rating input score 80
- Program expense ratio: 83.6%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: $18.26 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 95%; rating input score 95; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 27%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 9.95; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.3%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.8% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.5% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 80% of revenue deployed · 83.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 19 of 20 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $2.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $193K · 21 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 34 of 35 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 57/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 45/100.