Ashers Angel Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 333079405
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Las Vegas, NV, USA
- Rating
- 64
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Counseling, Support Groups
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $54,480
- Expenses
- $13,715
- Assets
- $40,765
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Elizabeth Bossy (President)
People named in this filing
- Elizabeth Bossy (President)
- Chris Ricketts (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We provide support education and meaningful experiences for anyone navigating grief through programs events and shared stories that foster connection and healing.
What it reported doing in 2025
6-Week Mindful Grieving Program Coming Soon! This program is open to anyone experiencing grief ages 18 and above. The Mindful Grieving 6-Week Program is an introduction to the essential components of this somatic-based approach to grieving collectively. The program provides a safe space for emotions to be felt expressed shared and healed. Program Includes: Guided Meditation Journaling Mindful Group Sharing Yoga Movement Relaxation Integration. Themes Explored: Creating a Safe Space for Grieving Presence & Body Awareness Self-Love & Acceptance Grief as a Teacher Evolution of Identity Through Grief The Process of Change. Inquire for more details. Facilitated by Stephanie Bossy LMFT & Mindful Grieving Facilitator 200YTT.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 40
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 74
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 18.8%; rating input score 19
- Program expense ratio: 74.8%; rating input score 75
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 74.8%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.97; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 18.8% of revenue deployed · 74.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $10K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 19/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.