Ashby Bowhunting Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 822454810
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- Cypress, TX, USA
- Phone
- 8328517125
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- General Science
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $21,606
- Expenses
- $28,237
- Assets
- $8,516
- Liabilities
- $820
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROB NEILSON (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ROB NEILSON (PRESIDENT)
- ED ASHBY (VICE PRESIDE)
- RHONDA NEILSON (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The ashby bowhunting foundation provides the bowhunter with the information to achieve the highest possible success rate and reduce the wound/non-recovery rate of the big game to the lowest level possible. Form 990-ez, part iii, line 28, program service accomplishments: in 2024, the foundation performed workshop in houston covering arrow penetration enhancing factors for approximately 4 hours workshop. The foundation also performed workshops and classes in Michigan and other states in us. The foundation conducted a workshop for the Texas parks and wildlife department hunter education group, instructing the instructors on how to use the findings in their classrooms across Texas to educate hunters. Form 990-ez, part v, information regarding personal benefit contracts: the organization did not, during the year, receive any funds, directly, or indirectly, to pay premiums on a personal benefit contract. The organization, did not, during the year, pay any premiums, directly, or indirectly, o
What it reported doing in 2024
See schedule o
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 23
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -30.7%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.3; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.1; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -80.8% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -62.5% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 35.2% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 21/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.