Ashburn Elementary Parent Teacher Organization

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
542006916
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Ashburn, VA, USA
Phone
5712522350
Rating
72
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue
$97,704
Expenses
$92,958
Assets
$136,341
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Christina Lane (President)

People named in this filing

  • Christina Lane (President)
  • Elyas Abi-Antoun (Treasurer)
  • Ashley Palietiello (VP Fundraising)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Ashburn Elementary Parent Teacher Organization is 100% volunteer run and with the time and talents of our team. From raising funds to build an outdoor classroom to shelving books in the library, the Parent Teacher Organization of Ashburn Elementary School, pledge our commitment to fully support our school community to ensure academic, social and personal success.

What it reported doing in 2024

Staff appreciation events, Teacher allotment for various class activities, Supporting Student benefits programs such as assemblies and after-school programs, provide grade level t-shirts to every student of every grade

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 62
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 57
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 61%; rating input score 61
  • Program expense ratio: 64.1%; rating input score 64

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 4.9%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.47; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 32.8% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 29.1% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 16.1% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 61% of revenue deployed · 64.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $60K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.