Ase Training Managers Council
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 363301289
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Leesburg, VA, USA
- Phone
- 7036696600
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $114,455
- Expenses
- $93,398
- Assets
- $118,982
- Liabilities
- $726
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MATT SHEPANEK (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MATT SHEPANEK (PRESIDENT)
- COLIN DUNCAN (TREASURER)
- DAVE JOHNSON (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The advancement of training and professional development in the transportation service industry through the collaborative efforts of the members.
What it reported doing in 2025
Members use their collective knowledge to address topics and problems common to the transportation training industry. The atmc conducts a yearly training benchmarks survey designed to establish a base line for comparison and track trends in the auto and truck training industry. The council holds a yearly roundtable discussion between industry firms and career and technical education instructors at the ase education foundation instructors conference to cement a close relationship between the two groups. The council sponsors the atmc national excellence in training awards to shine a spotlight on highly effective or innovative training and to remind the industry of the importance that training plays in its success. The council administers the ase accreditation program for training providers of continuing auto and truck service education.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 64
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 18.4%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.27; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 5.8% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.8% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 40/100.