Asbury Communities Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
521862677
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Frederick, MD, USA
Phone
3012502100
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Nonmonetary Support N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$22,433,531
Expenses
$21,749,480
Assets
$22,027,328
Liabilities
$77,180,641

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

20 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DOUG LEIDIG (PRESIDENT/EX-OFFICIO)
  • KIMBERLY EHRENFRIED (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • BRIAN DAVENPORT (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • BRIANA STEWART (SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • DOUG LEIDIG (PRESIDENT/EX-OFFICIO): $1,411,192 total reported compensation
  • ANDREW JEANNERET (CFO/TREASURER): $743,578 total reported compensation
  • TODD ANDREWS (ASST. SECRETARY): $547,211 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our mission is exploring possibilities to live your best life by doing all the good we can with integrity, transparency, and grace.

What it reported doing in 2024

Asbury communities, inc. ("asbury") is a tax-exempt, not-for-profit, supporting organization pursuant to 501(c)(3) and 509(a)(3) of the internal revenue code. Asbury provides defined business, administrative, and operational support to a system of 501(c)(3) tax-exempt, not-for-profit supported organizations that provide residential living and health care services to the aged. Beyond residential housing for the aged, the supported organizations also provide assisted living, skilled nursing, long term care, pace (life) programming, rehabilitation, pharmacy, and other ancillary services pursuant to their respective not-for-profit missions.i. Organization overviewasbury communities, inc. ("asbury") is a not-for-profit Maryland corporation organized under sections 501(c)(3) and 509(a)(3) of the internal revenue code. Asbury provides centralized business, administrative, operational, and strategic support to a system of not-for-profit, tax-exempt organizations dedicated to serving older adults by providing high quality residential living and health care services.the asbury system includes a continuum of services, including independent living, assisted living, memory support, skilled nursing, long-term care, life (living independently for elders, also known as pace), pharmacy, rehabilitation, and other ancillary programs - all delivered in alignment with the respective missions of the supported organizations.asbury communities, inc. Traces its origins to the establishment of asbury methodist village (gaithersburg, md) in 1926, originally founded as the methodist home for orphans and the aged. While no longer formally affiliated with the united methodist church, asbury continues to uphold the ethical and spiritual principles of its founding. The mission and values of the organization are expressed through its guiding principle: "doing all the good we can with integrity, transparency, and grace."ii. Program services providedsection a: benevolent care benevolent care is financial support provided to eligible residents who have exhausted their financial resources through no fault of their own and meet the approval criteria. This assistance helps cover a portion of the monthly service fees, certain ancillary expenses, and certain third-party costs.in 2024, more than $7.0 million in annual funds and unrestricted gifts were contributed to support residents, including those who have outlived their resources. In 2024, benevolent care support was provided for 70 residents across asbury's continuing care retirement communities:-asbury methodist village $1,598,855-asbury solomons $332,913-bethany village $963,381-normandie ridge $477,315-riverwoods $158,979-springhill $191,277total: $3,722,720 section b: unreimbursed medical services unreimbursed medical services represent the cost of care delivered in skilled nursing centers that exceed reimbursement provided by medicaid and other government payors. These unreimbursed costs reflect the organization's commitment to quality care regardless of a resident's ability to pay.unreimbursed care costs for 2024 include:-asbury methodist village $2,506,365-asbury solomons $588,027-bethany village $582,128-normandie ridge $868,236-riverwoods $2,968,367-springhill $735,967total: $8,249,090section c: community benefitas a not-for-profit organization, asbury communities is committed to enriching the lives of individuals both within and beyond the walls of its communities. Through collaboration, education, and outreach, asbury expands its impact by addressing unmet needs and building strong community partnerships. In 2024, these efforts included:-providing internships, mentorships, and clinical rotations to prepare future professionals in aging services and healthcare-advancing environmental sustainability through initiatives that reduce energy use and protect natural resources, including the chesapeake bay-supporting youth and families through school partnerships, mentoring, and civic engagement-participating

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Expenses are high relative to revenue and assets have declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 68
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 42
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 77.5%; rating input score 77
  • Program expense ratio: 76.4%; rating input score 76
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 6 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 3%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.01; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 3.5; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2%; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2.7% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 77.5% of revenue deployed · 76.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 11 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $16.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $1.4M · 20 people listed · 6 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $49.4M reported
  • Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay and related organizations
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 15 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 47/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 36/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.