Asbestos Workers Local 24 Industry Advancement and Advocacy Fund

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
260615161
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Laurel, MD, USA
Phone
3017252400
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Labor Unions

Reported finances

Revenue
$46,547
Expenses
$64,629
Assets
$279,125
Liabilities
$2,000

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

People named in this filing

  • JULIO CAICEDO (TRUSTEE)
  • KENNY GRAVES (TRUSTEE)
  • MATT STILLITANO (TRUSTEE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The exempt purpose of the asbestos workers local 24 industry advancement and advocacy fund is to work to promote a positive image of union workers and contractors: to owners, government officials, presently non-union contractors and workers, and the general public; to use newsletters, conferences, industry celebrations and other means to inform participating contractors and the general public about its activities and the opportunities that derive from those activities; to otherwise implement the purposes and provisions of the labor-management cooperation act of 1978 in the area of union members' health and safety; and to solicit and obtain financing for the fund from any and all lawful sources including employers, employer associations, private foundations, the federal government, state governments, and the union and its affiliates. This is essentially the only program service of the organization and all of the revenues and expenses are considered to be for this purpose.

What it reported doing in 2025

The exempt purpose of the asbestos workers local 24 industry advancement and advocacy fund is to work to promote a positive image of the union workers and contractors: to owners, government officials, presently non-union contractors and workers, and the general public; to use newsletters, conferences, industry celebrations and other means to inform participating contractors and the general public about its activities and the opportunities that derive from those activities; to otherwise implement the purposes and provisions of the labor-management cooperation act of 1978 in the area of union members' health and safety; and to solicit and obtain financing for the fund from any and all lawful sources including employers, employer associations, private foundations, the federal government, state governments, and the union and its affiliates. This is essentially the only program service of the organization and all of the revenues and expenses are considered to be for this purpose.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 84% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 41
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -38.8%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.32; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 12.5% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 15/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 26/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.