ArtsNatchez Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 261888290
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Natchez, MS, USA
- Phone
- 6014420043
- Rating
- 40
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Arts Education
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $50,940
- Expenses
- $64,917
- Assets
- $114,381
- Liabilities
- $35
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Connie Burns (President and Director)
People named in this filing
- Connie Burns (President and Director)
- Frank Gresock (Secretary and Director)
- Mary Ann Spell (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purposes of the Corporation are to stimulate, foster, promote, sponsor and encourage arts and artists in the greater Natchez area; to assist in establishing and developing local activities in the visual arts; to sponsor cooperative planning, research, fundraising, and public education programs relating to to the visual arts in the greater Natchez area; and to undertake such services and programs as deemed necessary to encourage participation in, appreciation of and accessibility to the arts in the greater Natchez area.
What it reported doing in 2024
The purposes of the Corporation are to stimulate, foster, promote, sponsor and encourage arts and artists in the greater Natchez area; to assist in establishing and developing local activities in the visual arts; to sponsor cooperative planning, research, fundraising, and public education programs relating to to the visual arts in the greater Natchez area; and to undertake such services and programs as deemed necessary to encourage participation in, appreciation of and accessibility to the arts in the greater Natchez area. These purposes were fulfilled through gallery openings, education forums, and participation in community activites.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 86% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 38
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -27.4%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.76; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.7% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 19.9% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 19/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 35/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.