Arts in Motions Dance Corporation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 830928745
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2018
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2018
- Location
- Flint, MI, USA
- Phone
- 8103362529
- Rating
- 52
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Arts, Culture, and Humanities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $17,646
- Expenses
- $5,050
- Assets
- $17,646
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
1 person listed
People named in this filing
- ANTINEK JOHNSON (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Arts in motion dance corporation provides free dance lessons to disadvantaged students grade 2-12 years of age. Our dance program is educational based, therefore, the classes are provided conveniently in the school or daycare facility. Dance lessons included are ballet, jazz, african, hula, praise, cheer, creative movement, hip-hop, tap, and majorette. Arts in motion dance corporation also provide free yoga and mindfulness classes to help students with self awareness and control. Mindfulness and yoga has been proven to reverse the effects of the lead due to flint's ongoing water crisis.
What it reported doing in 2018
Arts in motion has serviced over 500 students in the flint and surrounding areas; teaching dance in an educational setting. Students have performed in several recitals over the past years. The educational community loves our program because it is a positive outlet for the students in flint and surrounding areas.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 84% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 30
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 84
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 13.2%; rating input score 13
- Program expense ratio: 59.4%; rating input score 59
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 71.4%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.49; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 13.2% of revenue deployed · 59.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 13/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 59/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.