Arts in Motion
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 201635759
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2020
- Location
- Omaha, NE, USA
- Phone
- 4029320796
- Rating
- 41
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Heart and Circulatory System Diseases, Disorders
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $155,733
- Expenses
- $126,725
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Nancy Brosamle (President)
People named in this filing
- David Harding (Executive Dir.)
- Nancy Brosamle (President)
- Patricia Stastny (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
A social development program that utilizes the arts to teach character, team work, responsibility, goal setting, and physical fitness to also reinforce positive relationships, build self-esteem, confidence, and social awareness through the practice of social dance.
What it reported doing in 2020
Dancing classrooms - a ballroom dance program, during the school day for 5th and 6th grade students as well as 9th-12th grade special education students. Dancing classrooms introduces children to the art form of ballroom dance, which they can enjoy throughout their life. Dancing classrooms is also a specific method of teaching dance that is designed to foster teamwork, mutual respect and discipline among diverse classmates. Through the mastery and performance of six basic ballroom dances, students develop a greater sense of confidence, civility, tolerance, and patience within themselves and for each other. Students improve their fitness and coordination as they focus their physical energy on the rhythmic movement to music. Finally, the students broaden their knowledge of the artistic, cultural, historic, and geographic elements of the six dances. Due to COVID last year's programs were cancelled.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 13
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 30
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 12%; rating input score 12
- Program expense ratio: 14.8%; rating input score 15
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 18.6%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 36.7%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -22.4% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.3% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -15.1% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 12% of revenue deployed · 14.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $19K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2013 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 12/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 15/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.