Arts Impact Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
010573988
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Cleveland, OH, USA
Phone
2167724722
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Dance

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$957,952
Expenses
$1,044,279
Assets
$277,715
Liabilities
$21,331

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

15 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CLYDE MILES (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • DERRICK GRAHOVAC (EXECTUIVE DI): $99,507 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Arts impact brings learning to life through art. The organization's primary purpose is to use the arts to help children learn, create, imagine, dream, explore, grow, and succeed.

What it reported doing in 2024

Arts impact's innovative arts-integrated programs respond to educational trends and meet the needs of students, teachers, and the community of greater cleveland. The organization has served 50,000 students during the past 24 years. Our mission is to bring learning to life through art. Our primary purpose is to use the arts to help children learn, create, imagine, dream, explore, grow and succeed. Arts impact has become an important school partner for the cleveland metropolitan school district (cmsd), in particular, by providing multisession arts integration residencies that impact achievement and increase student engagement. First graders build bird gliders while studying life science. Second graders create digital stop-motion animations on ipads while studying the weather and atmosphere. This creative, hands-on learning helps the curriculum "stick." since 2023, arts impact has been offering arts integration through an intensive delevery model in two schools. This is proven highly effective with program evaluation showing increased student engagement and joy in learning. Both students and teachers were highly satisfied with the program. Since 2019, arts impact has offered series of arts-based programs for middle school and high school students, to explicitly address social and emotional learning (sel). Each workshop includes introduction of an sel competency, discussion, activities, and an art project to deepen the learning of that competency. Arts enrichment programs take place in schools and community organizations during out-of-school time. These workshops and camps are arts-based and not tied to other aspects of the curriculum as the steam and sel offerings are. Professional artists guide students to paint murals, design logos, sculpt, dance, and more. Arts impact artist-educators also lead local educators through professional development opportunities to build skills in arts integration

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 75
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 22
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 85.5%; rating input score 85
  • Program expense ratio: 78.4%; rating input score 78
  • Fundraising efficiency: $4.89 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -9%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.27; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 9.5%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 85.5% of revenue deployed · 78.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $818K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $100K · 15 people listed
  • Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 17/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 12/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 38/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 46/100.