Artreach
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 411969257
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2019
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2019, Form 990-N 2011
- Location
- Red Wing, MN, USA
- Phone
- 6513884488
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Arts Education
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $88,532
- Expenses
- $65,867
- Assets
- $36,918
- Liabilities
- $1,388
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KRISTIN KRAABEL (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ANNA OSTENDORF (PROGRAM DIRE)
- KRISTIN KRAABEL (PRESIDENT)
- PAO PAO O'CONNELL (VICE PRESIDE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Artreach provides access to the arts and the enrichment it brings. Artreach of red wing believes creative expression is a fundamental need for all people.
What it reported doing in 2019
Artreach serves people of all ages, from preschool though adulthood. Artreach provides art experiences to groups including the red wing woman's shelter, free art days for young families, private art lessons, art camp in the summer for children, art focused birthday parties as well as fee based programs for adults.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 67% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 66
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 51
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 58.1%; rating input score 58
- Program expense ratio: 78.1%; rating input score 78
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 25.6%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.56; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 21.2%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 26.5% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 14.6% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.6% per year; rating input score 0; 38th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 58.1% of revenue deployed · 78.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $51K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2012 to 2019
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 58/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 29/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.