Artists for a New South Africa

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
954544830
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2013
Forms available
Form 990 2013
Location
Los Angeles, CA, USA
Phone
3107793346
Rating
65
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Civil Rights

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$105,748
Expenses
$204,765
Assets
$87,080
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

15 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SHARON GELMAN (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • SHARON GELMAN (PRESIDENT): $121,000 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Artists for a new south africa works in the u.s. And south africa to combat HIV/AIDS, advance human and civil rights, educate and empower youth, preserve the legacies and values of anti-apartheid leaders, and build bonds between our nations through arts, culture, and the shared pursuit of social justice.

What it reported doing in 2013

Founded in 1989 by noted members of the arts and entertainment community to support south africa's quest for freedom and democracy, artists for a new south africa (ansa) has since raised over $9 million for effective african nonprofits, shipped more than 70 tons of medical supplies and books to impoverished communities and reached millions of people across the u.s. And africa, with essential information about HIV/AIDS and voting rights. Since 2005, ansa has provided annual ongoing comprehensive care and services to over 3,500 AIDS orphans and vulnerable children in south africa. In keeping with ansa board's decision in 2012 to begin winding down the organization's operations, ansa closed down our external offices in july 2013, donating office furniture and supplies to local charities and worked on the turnover of intellectual property rights. Much of the programmatic work focused on preserving the legacy of the anti-apartheid movement and its leaders for future generations as well as on organizing the organization's archives and the documentation of ansa's history. Ansa's public education and media program focuses on developing, advising, and/or promoting media, books, psa campaigns, films, tv, theater and events that educate audiences about africa, HIV/AIDS, human and civil rights and related issues. 2013 work included extensive efforts in response to the hospitalization, pending death, and funeral of nelson mandela. Ansa worked on the bet special, "mandela: freedom's father" which aired on the icon's 95th birthday, providing historic photos and footage and arranging interviews with key ansa representatives and supporters, including alfre woodard, blair underwood, cch pounder, deborah santana, jurnee smollett, harry belafonte, ansa's executive director sharon gelman and mandela biographer, richard stengel. In addition to advising the embassy on its advance planning for media and memorials, ansa issued its own organizational press release upon mr. Mandela's passing and responded to extensive media requests, arranging interviews with multiple outlets including cnn, npr, bet, al jazeera, kpfa, the south african broadcasting corporation, feature story, jn1 and more. Sharon gelman penned tributes to mandela that were featured on care2.com and the south african online magazine hot.ansa also arranged an interview with desmond tutu and narration by alfre woodard (who went on to serve as executive producer) for the award-winning documentary "soft vengeance: albie sachs and the new south africa". Ansa helped promote the film as well as the feature film "long walk to freedom" about the life of nelson mandela.ansa worked with the los angeles public library, arranging for justice albie sach to participate in "aloud", their public reading serie, and arranged for him to be interviewed on stage by npr host renee montagne. Ansa also helped to promote the new south african arts fest in los angeles.ansa provided ongoing social media content on facebook and twitter that that reached over 2,000 people per week with news and information about south africa, HIV/AIDS and social justice issues and events. Ansa also worked with the ahmed kathrada foundation on the conceptualization on a new back about mr. Kathrada and robben island.ansa continued effort to promote nelson mandela's favorite african folktales, ansa's award-winning star-studded audiobook that raises money for AIDS orphans in south africa, while introducing listeners worldwide to african culture. Ansa worked with the publisher hachette audio to ensure that all proceeds raised from the audiobook would go straight to ansa's grantees, the nelson mandela children's fund and the AIDS foundation of south africa, starting in september 2014.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 63% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 58
  • Transparency & Controls: 86
  • Accountability: 74
  • Sustainability: 18
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 77.7%; rating input score 78
  • Program expense ratio: 40.1%; rating input score 40
  • Fundraising efficiency: $3.03 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -93.6%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.43; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 59.1%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -27.4% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -54.1% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 77.7% of revenue deployed · 40.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $82K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $121K · 15 people listed
  • Consistency: 22 of 23 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2010 to 2013
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 40/100.
  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 14/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.
  • High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is not authorized to operate as a charity in California.