Artillery Ocs Alumni Chapter Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 743052514
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Ft Sill, OK, USA
- Phone
- 5803555275
- Rating
- 64
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- History Museums
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $67,082
- Expenses
- $13,565
- Assets
- $172,382
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MR WILLIAM FORD (President)
- COL R HARVEY GLOWASKI (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- MR WILLIAM FORD (President)
- COL R HARVEY GLOWASKI (Vice President)
- MR RANDY DUNHAM (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Preserve the history and archives of the artillery officer candidate school & hall of fame; support sustainment of the artillery ocs heritage hall; contribute to a local endowed scholarship for rotc cadets; and coordinate and host gatherings and reunions of ocs graduates, as may be practicable.
What it reported doing in 2024
Artillery ocs heritage hall sustainment continued in fy 2024 with the purchase of two 6-foot heavy duty benches for the courtyard near the east entrance. Visitors and military students will have 24 hours access. The location provides an opportunity to relax and view the surrounding historical displays. Tens of thousantds of visitors expected each year.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 62% for direct work, and 38% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 40
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 80
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 16.4%; rating input score 16
- Program expense ratio: 81%; rating input score 81
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 79.8%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 12.71; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -33.8% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -20.4% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 16.4% of revenue deployed · 81% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $11K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 16/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.