Arthritis Research Institute of America Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 592438325
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Clearwater, FL, USA
- Phone
- 7274614054
- Rating
- 64
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $72,064
- Expenses
- $107,045
- Assets
- $2,885,260
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHELE SKELLY (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- THOMAS SKELLY (DIRECTOR): $43,939 total reported compensation
- MICHELE SKELLY (PRESIDENT): $11,446 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The arthritis research institute of america inc. Has completed its 25 year study of epidemiology of osteoarthritis (oa), a leading cause of pain in adults. Current objectives include supporting 501(c)(3) not for profit organizations that care for those adults with oa, alleviate the pain of oa, and research oa.
What it reported doing in 2025
Grants were provided to supporting 501(c)(3) not for profit organizations that care for those adults with oa, alleviate the pain of oa, and research oa.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 49
- Transparency & Controls: 83
- Accountability: 72
- Sustainability: 45
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 71%; rating input score 71
- Program expense ratio: 29%; rating input score 29
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 80.6%; rating input score 81; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -48.5%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 26.95; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 51.7%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -37.1% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.2% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.4% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 71% of revenue deployed · 29% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 2 of 3 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $31K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $44K · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 18 of 19 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2012 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 29/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 25/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.