Art House Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
341926856
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Cleveland, OH, USA
Phone
2163988556
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Arts, Cultural Organizations - Multipurpose

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$449,472
Expenses
$426,800
Assets
$658,595
Liabilities
$15,828

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DOUG PEASE (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • LAILA VOSS (EXECUTIVE DI): $61,342 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Art house, inc.'s mission is to inspire expression and exploration through the visual arts.

What it reported doing in 2024

Cultural explorations: cleveland recreation centers this program includes one-time and 5- 10-week sessions focuses on introducing various cultural traditions such as day of the dead, chinese new year, kwanzaa, hanukkah, dwali. Participants create sugar skulls, lanterns, candle holders, roosters, etc. Some of the family classes at ah artists also focus on various cultural holidays such as those listed above as well as minor holidays such as: mardi gras, st. Patrick's day and earth day. Art house studio classes and workshops: these are fee-for-service: 3-8 weeks long for children, teens, and adults. Beginning- advanced levels. They cover a range of media: pottery, drawing, painting, mosaic tiles, clay jewelry. We also offer special one-time workshops, private sessions for businesses, birthdays, etc. Community culture night: this is a quarterly series of free lectures. Artists and other creative professionals spend an evening at art house to talk about their work and process. Past lecturers include ceramicist eva kwong, sculptors/fabricators: mike moritz & steve jordan, photographers: amber n. Ford, mckinley wiley, anastasia panstios. A special ccn event was the opportunity to invite poets michelle smith and ray mcniece to read during the urban bright exhibition, including poems that were inspired by particular artworks in the show. Art house artist dialogues: is subset of ccn that we added. These are virtual sessions for which we pair two of our teaching artists who discuss their own work and the work they do in our programs. Summer camps- in-person 4 days, 1.5 hours per session. These camps cover illustration, clay projects, multi-media projects, mixed-media sculptures, watercolor, focus on nature, recycling- stewardship art movements, fashion, and dreams. Artist inventory challenge: this is an evening when invited artists (we can only accommodate a maximum of 18) to create new work inspired by our excess of donated items, to engage in conversation and regenerate. The public is also invited in to observe and talk to the artists. The event includes an exhibition of the artwork that results. Other: we provide one-time workshops or class series for other agencies/ organizations such as the cleveland public libraries, benjamin rose institute on aging, the cleveland sight center, and orange community education and recreation. New partners include the lgbt center and the mandel jewish community center art house sometimes has the opportunity to collaborate with other organizations such as comite mexicano or lake erie ink to provide workshops that focus on particular themes. Slowly rotating solo-mini-exhibitions to showcase our teaching artists are mounted in the display case. Examples of accomplishments: - art house served over 5,600 individuals through direct programming, and an additional 40,000+ through digital engagement this past year. - an unsolicited 50,000 award from the genesis foundation for the work we do with youth. - several murals and installations in the schools such as campus international: masks and maps; rg jones- students designed mural for the interior; luis munos marin - tile mural; artemus ward: tile bench.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 72
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 47
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 74.8%; rating input score 75
  • Program expense ratio: 77.7%; rating input score 78
  • Fundraising efficiency: $11.02 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.54; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 14.4%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 10.9% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 9.5% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.8% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 74.8% of revenue deployed · 77.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $332K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $61K · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 42/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 51/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 52/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 25/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 39/100.