Arnold Hall Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 222936068
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- North Pembroke, MA, USA
- Phone
- 7818266477
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Roman Catholic
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,419,111
- Expenses
- $1,521,739
- Assets
- $4,848,463
- Liabilities
- $64,421
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PETER BUCKLEY (President)
Highest reported compensation
- SHAREEN RADOR (Vice PresExec Directo): $41,116 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Corporation operates a conference center in Pembroke, MA in support of educational and religious programs conducted by Opus Dei, a Prelature of the Catholic Church.
What it reported doing in 2025
The objective of the programs offered at Arnold Hall is to provide an opportunity for men and women to seek to deepen their understanding of the Roman Catholic faith and their personal role in bringing Gods love to every corner of scoiety. This is done by offering classes in philosophy, theology and the history of the Church, as well as professional classes, seminars and spirtual retreats. The programs encourage the participant to study and reflect while providing an environment of quiet beauty with meal service and lodging. Arnold Hall serves approximately 2,500 people annually in both daily and overnight retreats, classes, seminars and clubs.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 61
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 80
- Sustainability: 79
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 57.2%; rating input score 57
- Program expense ratio: 86.7%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 37.1%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.19; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.7%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.5% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 18.2% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 57.2% of revenue deployed · 86.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 13 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $41K · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 57/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.