Armed Services Arts Partnership

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
474007504
IRS 990 coverage
2017–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Alexandria, VA, USA
Phone
2027308206
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Adult, Continuing Education

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,118,859
Expenses
$1,571,567
Assets
$1,426,067
Liabilities
$23,157

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Brian Jenkins (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • Brian Jenkins (CEO): $146,346 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Armed Services Arts Partnership (ASAP) is a nonprofit with a mission to build creative communities where veterans and their families thrive through the arts.

What it reported doing in 2025

ASAP programs include:(1) Classes: We offer seven-week, deep-dive classes in stand-up comedy, storytelling, improv, creative writing, theater acting, and visual arts. These classes provide participants an outlet for creative expression, skill-development, and camaraderie in a supportive environment. With two instructors and 12 veterans typically in each class, participants receive direct, personal attention and establish meaningful relationships with their peers. Classes culminate with graduation shows, which offer veterans a platform to share their talents with a public audience.(2) Workshops: We host introductory workshops ranging from three hours to two days across a broad variety of artistic disciplines taught by our corps of veteran instructors, local arts organizations, and members of our Artist Council. The frequency and diversity of these workshops provide veterans with accessible and continuous opportunities to grow, create, and connect with fellow veterans. (3) Performances: We collaborate with local partners to host community performances almost every week that offer veterans the opportunity to tell their stories and showcase their talents with supportive audiences. The consistency and intimacy of these performances build our performers' confidence while bridging the military-civilian divide with our audience. (4) Partnerships: Continuity of artistic engagement with our participants is critical for sustained outcomes around well-being. Therefore, we weave our offerings into the tapestry of local arts ecosystems by delivering the majority of our programs in collaboration with our partners - and we encourage our alumni to participate in partners' programming. If participants cannot afford our partners' advanced offerings, they may apply for support through our Scholarship Fund. This ensures any veteran who wants to grow through the arts can do so with ASAP.(5) Leadership Development Program: Graduates of ASAP classes who demonstrate commitment and express interest in mentoring or teaching future ASAP participants have the opportunity to enroll in our Leadership Development Program, which equips veterans to serve as an Alumni Mentor to a future class cohort or ultimately become a paid instructor for programs. In addition to providing alumni an opportunity to grow as leaders and serve fellow veterans, this provides ASAP a sustainable funnel of instructors who understand our culture and mission. (6) Teaching Artist Training: Arts organizations face significant barriers to supporting veterans and ASAP equips them to do so. Challenges for arts organizations include accessing the veteran population, offering trauma-aware programming, and demonstrating the impact of arts programs. We reduce these barriers and enhance capacity by offering an annual Teaching Artist Training (TAT) delivered by behavioral health specialists and ASAP staff. The training equips arts organizations and teaching artists with: (a) an understanding of military culture and how it manifests in the classroom, (b) the foundational elements of trauma awareness, and (c) grounding, mindfulness, and communication techniques to respond to crisis scenarios in the classroom. (7) Research, Monitoring & Evaluation: ASAP conducts research to monitor, evaluate, and improve our programming and to share best practices on community arts initiatives serving veterans. We publicly share the findings of our research so other organizations may learn from our best practices and better serve the military community.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 85% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 69
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 58
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 62.8%; rating input score 63
  • Program expense ratio: 84.6%; rating input score 85
  • Fundraising efficiency: $16.89 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 25.8%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.91; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 9.3%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 19.6% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 21.3% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 25.9% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 62.8% of revenue deployed · 84.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $146K · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2017 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 54/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 35/100.