Arlington-Mansfield Area YMCA
Legal name: Arlington-mansfield Area Young Men's Christian Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 751000839
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-T 2025
- Location
- Mansfield, TX, USA
- Phone
- 8172999629
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Young Men's or Women's Associations
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $8,323,816
- Expenses
- $9,495,594
- Assets
- $17,610,838
- Liabilities
- $8,433,529
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
41 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Thomas Eric Tucker (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- Thomas Eric Tucker (CEO): $304,895 total reported compensation
- Lindsy Fernandez (CFO): $175,177 total reported compensation
- Heidi Hardy (Chief Mission Advancement Officer): $142,996 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the YMCA is to put Christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all. We assist families in battling chronic diseases and obesity, eliminating risk of drowning and preventing child abuse. By taking advantage of our deep roots in the community and strong ties to local health care providers, the YMCA has the infrastructure to improve the health and safety of our families by providing programs to help prevent or reverse these critical issues. Empowered Youth We believe that ALL children and teens have potential. Thanks to the YMCA, more young people are taking a greater interest in learning and making smart life choices. Working with caring Y staff, children and teens are able to realize their potential by improving their educational readiness and closing achieve.
What it reported doing in 2025
Social Responsibility: Our YMCA responds to society's most pressing needs by developing innovative, community-based programs to help those in need to reach their full potential. We are committed to inspiring a spirit of service by uniting people in our community to participate in and work together for positive social change. In 2025, as a leading nonprofit in our community the Y worked side-by-side with our neighbors and community partners to ensure that everyone, regardless of age, income or background, had the opportunity to learn, grow and thrive. Programs like Special Friends help to offer a safe and fun environment for adults with special needs to exercise, learn and connect with others. To do our important work, we rely on support from members, donors, volunteers and community leaders who give their time, talent and treasure to the positively impact the lives of the people in our community. For additional details regarding these critical programs and their impact, see Schedule O.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 84% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 96% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 26
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 93.9%; rating input score 94
- Program expense ratio: 82.2%; rating input score 82
- Fundraising efficiency: $3.91 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -14.1%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.85; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.48; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.6% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.1% per year; rating input score 100; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 2 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 93.9% of revenue deployed · 82.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 37 of 37 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $7.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $305K · 41 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.2M reported
- Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 10/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 55/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 17/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 40/100.