Arkansas Youth Sports Development 2026

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
811788122
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2019
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2019, Form 990-N 2015
Location
Little Rock, AR, USA
Phone
5018506032
Rating
89
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Amateur Sports

Reported finances

Revenue
$41,030
Expenses
$41,930
Assets
$101
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

People named in this filing

  • BENECIA MOORE (ASSISTANT)
  • ANTONIO MOORE (HEAD COACH)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization's primary exempt purpose is funding the joe johnson hawks 2026 aau travel basketball team's activities during the season - although the boys play year-round.

What it reported doing in 2019

In preparation for the 2020 travel basketball season, aysd 2026 purchased three sets of uniforms (white, red, and black). Those uniforms were screen printed. Aysd also purchased basketball shoes for the players (3 pair per player x 14), socks, travel duffel bags, backpacks, hooded sweatshirts, sweat pants, warm-up shirts (2 types, tshirt and a hoodie), and toiletries for all players. Aysd purchased collared-shirts and shoes for the coaching staff in three colors (4 coaches). In 7th grade, players move from using a 28.5" basketball to a 29.5" basketball, so the progam purchased 14 new balls. In order to continue practicing after covid, aysd purchased electronic whisltes, covid antibody tests, masks and other ppe, hand sanitizer, and electronic/visual thermometers.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Member-benefit provider. The nonprofit used 100% of its reported program spending for member benefits.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 95
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 35
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 96.3%; rating input score 96
  • Program expense ratio: 94.2%; rating input score 94

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -2.2%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -41.3% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -40.8% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -84.4% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 96.3% of revenue deployed · 94.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $40K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2016 to 2019
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 4/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 40/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.