Arkansas Military Veterans Hall of Fame Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
273952941
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2025
Location
Conway, AR, USA
Phone
8883293845
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Military, Veterans' Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$68,373
Expenses
$33,192
Assets
$129,369
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

People named in this filing

  • ANGEL GUZMAN (CHAIRMAN)
  • ROGER RICKARD (VICE CHAIRMAN)
  • GARY BUSH (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Part iii - primary exempt purpose: to honor Arkansas military veterans and to educate arkansans through the Arkansas military veterans hall of fame (amvhof) website of their outstanding accomplishments. An annual banquet is held where fifteen Arkansas military veterans will be inducted into the hall of fame and awarded the hall of fame medallion recognizing their military service to our nation and to the state of Arkansas. Of the fifteen inductees, up to eight will be selected exclusively for theit valorous military service to our country and up to seven will be selected for their combined military/civilian service to our community, state and nation.

What it reported doing in 2025

Part 111 - line 28: program service accomplishments: to honor Arkansas military veterans and to educate arkansasans through the arkansasmilitary veterans hall of fame (amvhof) website of their outstanding accomplishments.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 68
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 80
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 48.5%; rating input score 49
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 51.5%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.9; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -16.5% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -4% per year; rating input score 0; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 30.9% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 48.5% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $33K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 49/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.