Arkansas Council of Teachers of Mathematics

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
710581766
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
West Memphis, AR, USA
Phone
9014937525
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$32,566
Expenses
$35,133
Assets
$81,862
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Patricia Goodman (President)
  • Jacob Sisson (Past President)

People named in this filing

  • Patricia Goodman (President)
  • LaDawn Ross (Secretary)
  • Joanne Smith (Financial Officer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Promote math education K-16

What it reported doing in 2025

Regional and State math contests - Contests were held again this year both at the regional and state levels. Medals were purchased and presented at the 10 Regional sites in six subject areas: Algebra I, Geometry, Algebra II, Trig/Precal, Statistics, and Calculus. The winners from each region were invited to participte at the state level contest. Medals were presented at the awards ceremony with cash awards given to the first, second, and third place winners. Trig/Precal, calculus and statistics winners were awarded 300/200/100 and the other three contest winners were awarded 150/100/50. Medals have to be purchased and shipped to each of the 10 regional sites.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 91% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 77% for direct work, and 23% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 67
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 49
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 67.7%; rating input score 68
  • Program expense ratio: 64.8%; rating input score 65

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -7.9%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.33; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 29% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 12.4% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.5% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 67.7% of revenue deployed · 64.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $23K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 31/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.