Arizona Vocational Agricultural Teachers Association Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
860375415
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Phoenix, AZ, USA
Phone
6026974292
Rating
89
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$107,771
Expenses
$93,458
Assets
$71,757
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MELISSA VEO (PAST PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR)
  • AJ ARGUENTA (PRESIDENT ELECT/DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • MELISSA VEO (PAST PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR)
  • AJ ARGUENTA (PRESIDENT ELECT/DIRECTOR)
  • ISAIAH GOVEA (COMMUNICATIONS CHAIR/DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Arizona vocatiional agriculture teachers association is an organization that provides leadership and professional development opportunities for Arizona agricultural educators.

What it reported doing in 2025

The Arizona vocatiional agriculture teachers association is an organization that provides leadership and professional development opportunities for Arizona agricultural educators. We are a diverse group of individuals who pride themselves on their passion, dedication, and family-like inclusion. During the 2025-2026 we held a fall conference as well as sent members to the national naae conference and a regional conference. We encourage excellence by awarding regional teacher of the year awards and by providing scholarships for student teachers.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 83% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 96% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 82
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 60
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 77.5%; rating input score 77
  • Program expense ratio: 89.1%; rating input score 89

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 13.3%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.77; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 13% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 18.2% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.6% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 77.5% of revenue deployed · 89.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $83K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.