Arizona Urological Society

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
270846916
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Santa Ana, CA, USA
Phone
7145509155
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues

Reported finances

Revenue
$127,345
Expenses
$112,130
Assets
$148,252

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Christian O Twiss MD (Past President)
  • Nahid Punjani MD MPH (President-elect)
  • Aqsa Khan MD (President)
  • Chris DeSantis (Executive Director)

People named in this filing

  • Christian O Twiss MD (Past President)
  • Juan Chipolini MD (Secretary/Treas)
  • Paul Yurcanin MD (State Represent)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Arizona Urological Society is a professional association of urologic physicians for the purpose of continuing medical educaton for the advancement of patient care and representation of Arizona urologist and their patients at the state and national level.

What it reported doing in 2025

Annual program that provided 5.5 units of continuing medical educaton credits to 45 members and residents in training. Includes activities which serve to maintain, develop or increase the knowledge and skills that a physician uses to improve upon patient care. Program also includes health policy updates to help members comply with and prepare for various regulatory changes affecting their practices.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 55
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 11.9%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.32; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 15.3% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.4% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.3% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2013 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.